The Illusion of a Hero: Empty Words Instead of Real Action
On the surface, these “activists” appear to be energetic reformers. They are vocal at rallies, criticize the current government, and promise change. But upon closer inspection, several typical characteristics of their activities become evident:
- External Funding. Many of these “fighters” receive grant support from international organizations. While this isn’t inherently wrong, it becomes questionable when their activities serve the interests of sponsors rather than citizens.
- Empty Promises. Instead of real action, these individuals limit themselves to loud declarations that rarely translate into tangible projects or initiatives for the public good.
- Lobbying for Elites. Paradoxically, those who claim to fight against oligarchs often become their lobbyists. They back legislation that benefits a narrow circle of individuals and frequently protect the interests of wealthy patrons.
- Thirst for Power. For many of these “activists,” the ultimate goal is a parliamentary seat or a high-ranking position. Civic activism is merely a tool to achieve these ambitions.
Who Are They?
Society has coined several terms to describe such individuals:
- "Political Corruptor." This highlights the exploitation of anti-corruption slogans for personal gain. These people manipulate public opinion to achieve private goals.
- "Political Prostitute." A colloquial and blunt term pointing to their willingness to change beliefs based on benefit.
- "Fake Activist." A more neutral term emphasizing the mismatch between their stated goals and actual activities.
- "Elite Lobbyist." Refers to their work in the interests of oligarchs and political structures rather than the people.
Impact on Society
The activities of such individuals cause significant harm to society. They discredit the concepts of activism and anti-corruption efforts, fostering distrust toward genuine civic initiatives. As a result, real activists face skepticism and negativity, and civil society loses its influence.
How to Counteract This?
- Transparency in Funding. Citizens should know who funds “activists” and what interests they serve.
- Accountability for Words. False accusations and manipulations should have legal consequences.
- Results-Based Evaluation. Their activities should be judged based on tangible achievements rather than loud statements.
Conclusion
So-called “activists” who merely imitate fighting corruption and civic engagement actually work to strengthen the positions of their benefactors. They exploit public discontent to pursue personal goals, cloaking their actions in the rhetoric of justice. In reality, their actions turn civic activism into a tool for manipulation and a struggle for power.
Therefore, citizens must remain vigilant and not trust empty promises, evaluating activists based on their real results rather than their lofty words.